In any case it's great that everyone gets a good experience regardless of the unit they chose and that should be the most important factor. Just that there is counter evidence and it should be considered that where we're making a claim that the on paper stats for SD vs SSD are being reversed, it may be due to a flaw in the testing rather than an actual hardware flaw. 256 GB NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 3 x4 or PCIe Gen 3 x2) 512 GB high-speed NVMe SSD (PCIe Gen 3 x4 or PCIe Gen 3 x2) All models use socketed 2230 m.2 modules (not intended for end-user replacement) All models include high-speed microSD card slot Some 256GB and 512GB models ship with a PCIe Gen 3 x2 SSD. The video you posted even notes that first loads are considerably slower on SD, so maybe there is some caching occurring. My point is, that in such a small window, other factors may lead to the SD outperforming the SSD in some situations. Which is exactly what Valve showcased prior to the Deck launch. That said, it's cool that we're bickering on seconds for either so it's great news on those who had to go for a 64gb model.Ĭan you provide a link that shows reverse results?Īgain, we're talking seconds in many cases. Originally posted by SockDog:Mmmm I'm calling some flawed testing there on the basis Valve and other have shown the reverse results. Product Description: Tech Specs Compute Processor AMD APU CPU: Zen 2 4c/8t, 2.4-3.5GHz (up to 448 GFlops FP32) GPU: 8 RDNA 2 CUs. Valve Steam Deck 256GB - Black Storage Capacity 256 GB Color Black Connectivity Headphone Jack, USB-C Resolution 1280 x 800 Features Wi-Fi Capability.
0 kommentar(er)
